>Subject: Accuracy in reporting
>Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:43:45 -0500
>
>Sirs:
>
>I can't seem to establish any dialog with your editorial page editor
>so I am bringing this to a wider audience. I suspect a hidden agenda
>in your coverage of the ongoing embarrassment of Alfred Brophy's
>digging up bodies peacefully at rest on campus. My suspicions began
>when you meted out only a couple of mildly critical letters about
>the issue when you are bound to be sitting on bags of scorching
>condemnation. In contrast, Brophy's antics are overwhelmingly
>castigated on the Crimson White web site. Maybe you are making an
>intentional effort to shape public opinion by creating the
>impression that the entire University community stands solidly
>behind this farce. Such subterfuge will surely please your New York
>masters. Or perhaps you are trolling for another Pulitzer Prize by
>stifling criticism and inflating this matter far beyond its
>importance.
>
>The Crimson White has been more accurate, fair, and balanced in its
>reporting. As an example, the News headlined on April 14 that "UA
>Faculty Senate passes resolution about slavery", while the CW
>correctly headlined that the resolution was passed by a senate
>committee. The next day the News printed a correction. An April 16
>News headline erroneously stated "University holds memorial service
>for two slaves buried on campus" (never mind that Dr. Manly held
>services in the President's Mansion for Boysey, and probably Jack
>too, 160 years ago). This service actually was conducted by the UA
>Coalition for Diversity, which represents who knows what, certainly
>not the University, its students, or its alumni. No correction to
>date that I have seen.
>
>The News next trifled with the facts in an April 18 editorial.
>Through use of words like "uncomfortable", "ignore" and "denial" a
>News editor implied that the University has intentionally obscured
>its past involvement with slaves. He further stated that Brophy
>"brought [this matter] to light". All Brophy, that editor, or anyone
>else needed do to discover these deep, dark "secrets" was open any
>of the popular books dealing with the University's history,
>including James Sellers's History of the University of Alabama,
>(1953, p. 38-41), Suzanne Wolfe's The University of Alabama, A
>Pictorial History, (1983, pp. 25, 31), Mary Mathews's A Mansion's
>Memories, (1980, p. 116), or Robert Mellown's The University of
>Alabama, A Guide to Campus, (1988, pp.18, 28). For instance, Mellown
>stated "President Manly also records the burial of two slaves in the
>[University] cemetery- Jack, a slave belonging to the University,
>was buried there on May 5, 1843, as was Boysey, a seven-year-old boy
>belonging to Dr. Manly, who died of whooping cough on November 22,
>1844." Just what kind of exposure did the News editor think
>appropriate for this information, billboards on the interstate?
>Banner planes at football games?
>
>And yesterday, a 72-point News headline "UA apologizes for history
>of slavery". Wrong again! The Crimson White's headline accurately
>and correctly states "Faculty Senate apologizes to descendants of
>slaves" The faculty senate is not the University or an agency of the
>University. It is basically just a puffed-up teachers' union.
>
>What headline fantasies does the future hold? The great tragedy of
>this whole situation is that news media all over the country are now
>repeating your misinformation. I can only hope that you are held
>accountable. It's truly a sad day when a student paper shows more
>professionalism than the vaunted, Pulitzer Prize-winning Tusclaoosa
>News.
>
>Have a nice day.
>
>